Which investments are in the focus of alternative investors?
Let me make a brief comment at the outset: Twenty years ago, in July 1997, we founded the Bundesverband Alternative Investments e.V. (BAI) with eight members with the aim of establishing a lobby for alternative investment strategies. At the time, the alternative investment industry was a niche and still in its infancy. After twenty years, the Alternatives have arrived in the mainstream. The industry manages an estimated USD 8 trillion in assets worldwide, and there are hardly any institutional investors left in Germany without an allocation to private markets or liquid alternatives. The BAI has grown over this time and now consists of 173 national and international member companies that represent the entire value chain in the alternative investment sector.
In the run-up to our annual Alternative Investor Conference, we regularly ask institutional investors in a survey about their plans in the area of alternative investments. Over the last twelve months, 86% of the investors surveyed have increased their allocations to alternative investments. What should be emphasized here is the extent to which investors’ expectations were met or even exceeded in the case of investments already made. In the private debt sector, for example, 70% of investors saw their return expectations met and 18% even exceeded. In terms of risk, around 96% of investors considered their expectations for their private debt investments to have been met, and 4% even to have exceeded them; in terms of portfolio diversification, 87% considered their expectations to have been met and even 10% to have exceeded them. Given the high satisfaction levels, it is not surprising that institutional investors are planning to increase allocations to private markets over the next 3–5 years, with a focus on infrastructure, private debt and private equity.
The regulatory framework has a fundamental influence on investors’ investment decisions. The BAI has been intensively involved in the private debt investment segment for many years and has intensively supported and helped to develop many of the framework conditions. The change in administrative practice on credit funds by BaFin in May 2015 and its legal implementation through the UCITS‑V Implementation Act together with KAMaRisk had a strong influence on the development of the market.
As an association, we have intensively accompanied and helped shape the consultations on this. We believe that German institutional investors should be able to invest in the funds of the best managers worldwide — and these are often located in Anglo-Saxon countries in the currently most attractive asset classes such as private equity, private debt, infrastructure and hedge funds/liquid alternatives. If German investor supervision law, for example. disallowing investments in funds of managers domiciled in the U.S. or other non-EU jurisdictions, this unnecessarily restricts the investment universe of these investors. It is also a particular concern of ours that a synchronization between supervisory law and tax law is ensured! Sensible — alternative — investment opportunities in infrastructure, private equity, private debt, absolute return should not be thwarted by tax law or restrictive requirements for special AIFs in the Investment Regulation. Avoiding goldplating of European regulations in Germany is also one of our constant demands. There must be no stricter, sometimes absurd requirements for the German fund industry and its investors.
A key factor influencing the private debt market is, of course, the increased capital requirements for banks under Basel III, which affected demand for alternative debt capital. In many cases, credit institutions have been more restrictive in granting loans over the past few years, thus opening up the field for alternative forms of financing. Alternative forms of financing have gained in importance, especially for small and medium-sized companies. In many cases, they offer greater flexibility in terms of term, remuneration and repayment, thus gaining in attractiveness for the borrower. This constellation is met on the opposite side by institutional investors who are looking for new and alternative forms of investment in the low-interest environment.
The US market is several years ahead of us in the private debt segment. The disintermediation of regulated U.S. banks by non-banks started more than 20 years ago and resulted in the banking sector accounting for only 20%(!) of all outstanding loans in the United States. Even though European borrowers now have access to the same range of financing alternatives as in the U.S., the European market will still need some time to achieve comparable size and standardization. Here, the European Securities and Market Authority (ESMA) is pushing for a uniform regulatory framework for credit funds. As long as these efforts do not lead to overregulation of the debt fund market, I see a very positive development in the private debt market over the next few years.
About Achim Pütz
Achim Pütz specializes in providing legal advice to German and international clients regarding traditional and alternative investment funds and specializes in the design, documentation and distribution of structured financial products and packaging solutions.
Pütz advises regulated and non-regulated institutional investors on their investments in complex alternative investment structures, in particular hedge and commodity funds, real estate and infrastructure funds as well as debt and private equity funds.
Pütz is founder and 1st chairman of the Bundesverband Alternative Investments e.V. and was a council member of the Alternative Investment Management Association (AIMA) for many years.